A patch of agricultural field bordering forest land in Southern Western Ghats in Kerala. (Image Credit: Indian Biodiversity Talks) |
A new study about forest cover loss shows that protected
areas (PAs) in Western Ghats were able to slow down the rate of deforestation.
However, in areas with high population density, deforestation rates are higher
even in the PAs.
Published in the Biological Conservation journal, the study
shows that the forest loss inside protect areas was 32 percent less than that
in other areas. However, the scenario is different in case of PAs
near dense human populations where there is a higher possibility of losing the
forest cover. “Where local human populations were higher in the Western Ghats,
protected areas were 70% more likely to lose forest cover than non-protected
areas”, says the study.
Analyzing a data set of satellite images of Western Ghats
between 2000 and 2016, the study estimates that there was a net loss of 750
square kilometers of forest cover in Western Ghats during the 16 year period. This
is slightly higher than the previous estimates.
The absolute forest loss was higher in evergreen forests
while the proportion of the forest loss compared to total forest area was more
in dry deciduous forests. “We found that evergreen forests showed the highest
net absolute losses, but loss rates as a proportion of forest area was highest among
dry deciduous forest.”, said Meghna Krishnadas, a researcher with the School
of Forestry and Environmental Studies at the Yale University who was part of the study.
The study also confirms the impact of roads on forest cover loss in Western Ghats, a tropical biodiversity hotspot. According to the study, there was a 16 percent increase
in forest cover loss for every 4 km closer to roads. Forest cover loss due to
proximity to roads was 32 percent lesser in protected areas than in
non-protected areas.
According to the researchers, properly distinguishing
between actual forests and plantations with natural tree canopies was a major
challenge. “We tried to overcome this limitation to some extent by using
land-cover data that classified 1 x 1-km areas into different land-use types.
Using this land-cover data, we only chose areas that were classified as forest.
This is of course not fool-proof, but we hope that this step removed areas that
are known to be plantations and monocultures. However, the best way to do this
would be ground-truth points but this is often infeasible for large landscape
studies,” says Meghna.
The researchers believable that the findings
would also help in making better policy decisions about conserving Western Ghats. “At
a broad scale, this would help to identify areas which are likely to be more
vulnerable to future [forest] losses,” Meghna said.
Meghna Agarwala from Earth Institute Center for
Environmental Sustainability, Columbia University, Sachin Sridhara from College
of Marine and Environmental Science, James Cook University and Erin Eastwoodd,
Center for International Forestry Research, Indonesia were also part of the
study.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please feel free to have your say on our stories. Comments will be moderated. anonymous Comments will not be approved. No links in the comment body unless meant for sharing a very relevant info.